Friday, December 31, 2004
Played the postIT note famous people name game. This is where everyone writes the name of a famous person, fictional character or just someone who is known by all the players on a postIT and sticks it to the forehead of the person sitting next to them.
Everyone then takes it in turn to ask questions in order to work out the name they have been given. Questions must be answerable by a 'yes' or 'no', and the player can continue to ask questions if they get a 'yes' response, otherwise the turn passes to the next player and they have to wait their turn again. Typical questions are: "am I male?, am I on TV?, am I British?" etc. A trick to maximise your chances of getting a positive response is to phrase your question to favour the least exclusive options. For example, (unless you have a suspicion that you are a singer) it's better to ask 'Am I not a singer?' rather than 'Am I a singer?' as there are more non-singers than singers and therefore you are more likely to get a positive answer.
On our second game, I had established that I was a British celebrity. I assumed, judging by the character of the person who had chosen the name, that I had been given the name of someone I truly despised. I tried to be devious by asking "Do I feature on the web site of 1001 people more annoying than Mick Hucknell?" (there is such a site, although it's name is slightly misleading as most of the people listed there are 'as annoying', 'even more annoying' or 'considerably more annoying' than Mr Hucknell). I thought there could be two possible responses to this question, either a decisive 'yes' meaning that this person was truly annoying, or a hesitant 'maybe' meaning that although I may personally despise this person, popular opinion was slightly more forgiving. However, I was given a surprise with a definite 'no'. This totally threw me, on the next turn I asked 'would I hate this person?' - yes, 'are you sure they are not on the 1001 people more annoying than Mick Hucknell list?' - yes. I was totally confused, it took half dozen turns before it dawned on me - 'am I Mick Hucknell' - YES!
Two games of something like this is normally the limit before the rules are mutated to keep the interest. So we played the PostIT insults game. The idea here that a name is posted on the head of one person who is then insulted in turn by the other players, the victim having to guess their own identify. We started with an easy one: "Your ears are massive", "Your girlfriend is the biggest minger in the world" and "Your mother is a bigoted old slag".
I then spoiled the game by posting the player's own name on their head, thankfully we only got as far as "You are very opinionated" (a borderline compliment in my book), he worked it out straight away.
Monday, December 20, 2004
Some great singing of:
Bread of Heaven
Hymns and Arias
Hen Wlad fy Nhadau
Stick your Chariots
There are a few points I'd like to make about the performance of such songs:
1) Pitching the song. If you are unable to pitch a song, then please do not be the one to start singing it. Designate someone in your group who in musically minded and ply them with drinks. They are the one who should start all songs. The national anthem is possibly one of the most beautiful melodies ever composed; it should never sound like cats being strangled, it should never be subjected to hundreds of people forcibly down-shifting the pitch in the first line of the song.
Remember that there is an octave jump from the 1st note to the 1st note in the 3rd bar, so you can mess it up almost as soon as you begin. Here's a tip. Remember the very beginning of the Hi-Ho song before the real melody begins, the low-Hi and the hi-Ho. These two notes are an octave apart, so if you start the anthem on the Hi, you need to make sure the Ho is comfortable. Get your Hi and Ho at the correct level and the pitch of the song should fall into place.
2) Delilah. This one winds me up no end. The lines at the end of the FIRST chorus are:
"I could see that girl was no good for me, but I was lost like a slave that no man could free". They are NOT:
"So before they come to break down the door, forgive me Delilah I just couldn’t take anymore"
Nobody ever gets this right! Not only are you missing out on singing the best line in the song (the rhythm required to fit this in with the notes is fun, and you can really go to town with a emotive delivery) "but I was lost like a slave that no man could free" - but you are also spoiling the narrative. Our protagonist is telling his story and you are screwing it up. He is waiting for the police to find him, he's remorseful and is telling the story of the events leading up to this desperate situation; but this is only to be revealed at the end of the song, you are spoiling the ending by revealing it before he has even admitted the murder. Imagine someone hearing this song for the first time at a rugby match (a small child perhaps, in the process of being schooled by his elders on basic morality). Imagine how confused they would be:
“Why will bad people break down the nice man’s door daddy? Why is the nice man asking nasty Delilah for forgiveness daddy, he’s done nothing wrong other than falling in love with the wrong woman (and a minor stalking incident)? It’s just not fair.”
“Son, listen, you are about to learn a very valuable lesson today. Sometimes life is not… Oh hang on… forget what I was just saying, they’ve just missed out a couple of lines and jumped straight to the ending.”
3) “Dad, what does ‘fucking chariots up your arse' mean?”
Keep rugby a family game. I would like to see this made less football-chant like and changed to: “you can go and stick your chariots up your arse”, and it should only be sang as a response to the sweet chariots song.